ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Patient-reported experiences of cognitive difficulties and their impact on daily life in narcolepsy type 1.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The cognitive difficulties experienced by individuals with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), a rare and chronic neurological disorder, are understudied, with limited knowledge of their consequences in daily life. Here, we investigated the nature of cognitive difficulties and their consequences for daily life from the perspective of adults with NT1. Methods: In-depth, qualitative interviews were conducted with adults diagnosed with NT1 residing in the United States. Participants were recruited through (1) a patient advocacy organization (via social media and website); (2) a professional market research firm; and (3) participant referrals. Individual interviews were conducted by telephone, following a semi-structured guide, and lasted approximately 90 min. Qualitative analysis used an adapted grounded theory approach to identify key conceptual themes related to cognitive difficulties and their impacts on daily life. Results: Of 46 participants, most reported experiencing some cognitive difficulties, with the most common being trouble remembering and difficulty with focus or sustained attention. Most participants characterized their difficulties with cognition as moderate or severe and reported these occurring daily. The qualitative findings informed the development of a conceptual model depicting cognitive difficulties and their broad impact on functioning and well-being in adults with NT1. Conclusion: Cognitive difficulties in adults with NT1 are frequent, severe, and described as interfering with daily life activities and well-being. These data highlight a clear need to assess cognitive function in people with NT1 and identify treatments that address NT1-associated cognitive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.