Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859349›Full record

ArticleBlood neoplasia2026

Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies protein associations and therapeutic targets for B-cell malignancy.

Molly Went, Charlie Mills, Amit Sud, Sina A Beer, Philip J Law, Codie Gerlach-Wood, Martin F Kaiser, Richard Houlston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood neoplasia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Molly WentDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Charlie MillsDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Amit SudDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Sina A BeerDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Philip J LawDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Codie Gerlach-WoodDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Martin F KaiserDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Richard HoulstonDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite therapeutic advances in B-cell malignancies, many patients continue to experience relapse or refractory disease, highlighting an unmet need for novel drug targets. The high attrition rate of drug development programs, however, represents a productivity-limiting step. To prioritize candidate drug targets, we used Mendelian randomization to evaluate causal associations between 2923 circulating proteins and 6 B-cell malignancies (22 922 cases and 388 978 controls). We identified 27 protein-disease associations, including TNFSF13 (APRIL) and TNFRS13B (TACI) in multiple myeloma, CD40 in Hodgkin lymphoma, and FAS in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. All results are interactively accessible via our R/Shiny application (https://software.icr.ac.uk/app/mrcan). Integrating single-cell RNA sequencing from 183 355 hematolymphoid cells, Bayesian colocalization, and clinical trial evidence, we prioritized 23 proteins as candidate drug targets. This study demonstrates the potential of human genetics to guide therapeutic discovery for B-cell neoplasia.

Identifiers

PMID41859349
PMCPMC12997324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.