Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859319›Full record

ArticleInfection prevention in practice2026

Effect of individual feedback on hand hygiene compliance in nursing homes.

A-M Iversen, M B Hansen, B Kristensen, S Ellermann-Eriksen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A-M IversenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Denmark.
M B HansenKonduto ApS, Sani Nudge, Copenhagen, Denmark.
B KristensenNational Center of Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
S Ellermann-EriksenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hand hygiene (HH) among healthcare workers (HCWs) is important to prevent infections in nursing homes. This study investigated the effect of providing HCWs with weekly feedback on individual hand hygiene compliance (HHC). Methods: A 6-month quasi-experimental study (September 2021 to May-2022) was conducted in two nursing homes (9 wards) in Denmark. During the intervention period (3 months), a weekly email with individualized HHC data was sent to HCWs who volunteered to receive individual feedback. HHC was monitored with an automatic hand hygiene monitoring system (AHHMS). Discussion: A total of 198 nurses and nurse assistants were enrolled. Sixty-seven signed up for the weekly email with individual HHC data (cluster: 'Individual feedback'), and 131 HCWs did not sign up for the intervention (cluster: 'No individual feedback'). The AHHMS registered more than 144,000 HH opportunities from residential apartments. We found a mean difference in baseline HHC between the two clusters (44% vs 52%) of +8 percentage points (95% confidence interval: 6, 10). Overall, the study found no improvements in HHC from baseline compared with the intervention in the cluster receiving individual feedback (52% vs 52%, Conclusions: There was no effect of individual feedback on HHC in nursing homes.

Indexed as

Electronic monitoring systemsHealthcare workersInfection preventionInterventionLong-term care

Identifiers

PMID41859319
PMCPMC12995893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.