Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859317›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Poor Outcome in Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection.

Shimeng Chen, Zhicheng Yang, Lijuan Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shimeng Chen *Department of Ultrasound, the Affiliated Central Clinical Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, 014040, People's Republic of China.
Zhicheng Yang *Department of Ultrasound, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou, 014040, People's Republic of China.
Lijuan YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou, 014040, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This exploratory study aimed to develop a preliminary nomogram for risk assessment of poor prognosis in spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCAD) and evaluate its statistical performance using internal validation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with sCAD (mean age 51.8 ± 14.0 years; 41 males [55%] and 34 females [45%]) diagnosed between November 2013 and April 2024. Poor prognosis was defined as imaging-confirmed acute cerebral infarction or hemorrhage (n=38); the remaining 37 patients comprised the good prognosis group. Due to the small sample size, variables with p<0.2 in univariate analysis (sex, extracranial CAD type, hypertension, hyperhomocysteinemia) were considered for multivariate modeling, though none were statistically significant predictors (all p>0.05). A multivariate logistic regression-based nomogram was constructed and internally validated using 1000 bootstrap resamples. Results: The final model included the four variables above. Only non-intramural hematoma (other) CAD type showed statistical significance in the multivariate model (OR=13.41, 95% CI: 2.89-62.17, P<0.01), while sex, hypertension, and hyperhomocysteinemia did not, likely reflecting statistical instability from inadequate power. In bootstrap internal validation, the model demonstrated moderate discrimination (AUC=0.788, 95% CI: 0.686-0.891) with a Brier score of 0.185. Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated acceptable calibration (χ Conclusion: This pilot study generates the hypothesis that ultrasonographic CAD type, combined with clinical variables, may aid in predicting sCAD outcomes. However, due to the small sample size (9.5 events/variable), lack of external validation, and inclusion of non-significant predictors, this model is not ready for clinical application. Multi-center prospective validation in a cohort of at least 400 patients is required before any clinical utility can be claimed.

Indexed as

cervical artery dissectionnomogrampilot studypoor prognosisrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41859317
PMCPMC12998569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.