ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Development of a Clinical Prediction Model for Ultra-Early Mild Acute Ischemic Stroke with Negative CT Results.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical guidelines highlight the challenge of distinguishing CT-negative ultra-early mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from transient ischemic attack (TIA) based solely on clinical manifestations. MRI-DWI, the gold standard for differentiation, is often inaccessible in primary hospitals due to cost and time constraints, leading to widespread CT use-with a false-negative rate in mild AIS, risking delayed thrombolysis.This study aims to establish a clinical prediction model for CT-negative ultra-early mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing the clinical data and laboratory test results of patients with CT-negative early mild ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), in order to promote early diagnosis and early treatment of AIS, thereby improving patient prognosis. Methods: This study compared and analyzed the clinical data of gender, age, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and laboratory test results such as homocysteine, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count, platelet count (PLT), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen (FIG), D-dimer, Random Blood glucose (GIU), total cholesterol (TCHO), triglycerides (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and platelet count to calculate the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in CT-negative ultra-early mild AIS and TIA patients, variables showing significant differences in difference analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of AIS,and the independent predictors were used to established a clinical prediction model for the diagnosis of early AIS with negative CT based on the statistical results. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that the NIHSS score, C-reactive protein (CRP), random blood glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (TCHO), triglycerides (TG), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are independent predictors of computed tomography (CT)-negative mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS), with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as follows: NIHSS score (OR = 5.497, 95% CI: 3.599-8.395; p < 0.001), CRP (OR = 1.128, 95% CI: 1.005-1.295; p = 0.038), random blood glucose (OR = 1.103, 95% CI: 1.013-1.268; p = 0.043), total cholesterol (OR = 1.626, 95% CI: 1.022-2.931; p = 0.023), triglycerides (OR = 1.337, 95% CI: 1.025-1.721; p = 0.031), and LDL-C (OR = 1.542, 95% CI: 1.142-1.959; p = 0.025). A clinical prediction model that included these factors showed a strong ability to discriminate between outcomes, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.830 in the training set and 0.804 in the validation set. Additionally, the model demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility across various threshold probabilities, indicating its effectiveness in practical applications. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that The developed clinical prediction model can assist in diagnosing CT-negative ultra-early mild AIS, thereby potentially improving patient outcomes through timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.