Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859287›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2026

Less Invasive Acute Rejection Surveillance After Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Experiences From a Low-intensity Biopsy Center.

Lisa-Maria Rosenthal, Luisa M Müller, Michaela M Freitag, Regina Stegherr, Mustafa Yigitbasi, Frank Konietschke, Oliver Miera, Titus Kühne, Felix Berger, Katharina R L Schmitt and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lisa-Maria RosenthalThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-1186
Luisa M MüllerThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Michaela M FreitagInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Corporate member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität zu, Berlin, Germany.
Regina StegherrInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Corporate member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität zu, Berlin, Germany.
Mustafa YigitbasiThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Frank KonietschkeInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Corporate member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität zu, Berlin, Germany.
Oliver MieraThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Titus KühneThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BergerThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina R L SchmittCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Katja WeissThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Danne FriederikeThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Fatima I LunzeThe Department for Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute rejection remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality early after pediatric heart transplantation (HT). Current guidelines recommend only endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) as reliable for rejection surveillance. We purposed to explore clinical outcomes of less invasive rejection surveillance in a low-intensity biopsy center in pediatric heart recipients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 46 pediatric heart recipients (median age 5.7 y; interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-8.0) discharged between 2011 and 2021. Clinical and echocardiographic evaluations were performed frequently, whereas protocol-based routine EMB were scheduled only at 1 and 2 y post-HT. Additional biopsies were performed if new-onset symptoms and/or a decline in graft function, as assessed by echocardiography, including tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-derived velocities, were detected. Results: Graft survival was not compromised by less invasive surveillance with 97.8% at 1 y and 95.7% at 2 y post-HT. A total of 680 echocardiograms (median 15 per recipient; IQR, 13-17) and 140 biopsies (median 3 per recipient; IQR, 2-4) were analyzed. Acute rejection (4 acute cellular rejection and 8 antibody-mediated rejection) was found in 8.5% of the EMB. None of the protocol-based routine EMB of asymptomatic patients revealed rejection. Absence of a reduction in TDI-derived left ventricular and interventricular septal systolic velocities, combined with clinical evaluation, correlated with nonrejection. Conclusions: Combining frequent clinical follow-up with echocardiographic assessment using TDI as a less invasive method of rejection surveillance did not compromise long-term clinical outcomes. Validated in larger pediatric cohorts, it could save invasive biopsies, reducing the risk of biopsy-related complications and medical costs.

Identifiers

PMID41859287
PMCPMC12999153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.