Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026
Resilience and sense of agency among healthcare professionals during crisis.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are central to emergency response, and their effectiveness depends not only on clinical expertise but also on psychological resources. Strengthening these resources may sustain workforce capacity and safeguard care under crisis conditions. This study examined the contribution of psychological capital-particularly resilience-to perceived agency among Israeli HCPs during mass casualty incidents and violent conflict after 7th of October 2023. The objective was to assess whether psychological resources predict perceived effectiveness beyond traditional factors, with implications for preparedness, organisational support, and policy. Findings may inform interventions relevant to resource-restricted environments and adaptable to developing countries. Methods: The study was designed as an observational-cross-sectional study, conducted using encrypted online questionnaires distributed via QR codes in trauma centres, dispatch stations, and professional forums. Participants were qualified physicians, surgeons, nurses, paramedics, and EMTs providing patient care during the conflict. Instruments measured psychological capital (PCQ-24), resilience (CD-RISC 10), and perceived agency (RSES). Results: 204 HCPs participated (mean age 37.4, SD = 11.6; 61.8% male). Psychological capital ( Conclusion: Psychological capital and resilience are key determinants of HCPs' perceived agency in crises. Embedding resilience-building into public health systems, alongside organisational and policy measures, may enhance workforce readiness across conflict, disaster, and health threats. These findings are especially relevant to resource-limited settings, where psychological preparedness may be a cost-effective means to support frontline staff and sustain delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.