ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2026
More than a medication: The lived meaning and value of long-acting injectable buprenorphine.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People who use substances often experience stigma in healthcare settings. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT), while effective, is criticised for rigid structures that limit autonomy and reinforce stigma. Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) offers an alternative that may reduce these barriers. This study explores the perceived meaning and value of LAIB in supporting recovery. Methods: A longitudinal qualitative study was conducted in community drug treatment services in Tayside, Scotland. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 47 patients (LAIB: n = 29; traditional OAT: n = 18) and 9 clinicians. Patient participants were invited to up to three interviews over 18 months. Data were analysed using framework analysis informed by the Social Identity Model of Recovery, recovery capital, and locus of control. Results: Four themes emerged: (i) avoiding unwanted contacts, (ii) pursuing a "normal life," (iii) planning for the future, and (iv) service-related challenges. LAIB reduced exposure to stigmatising environments and supported autonomy, enabling participants to engage in employment, family life, and travel. Many described renewed hope and proactive future planning. However, reduced service contact and administrative pressures limited holistic, person-centred care. Conclusions: LAIB can enhance recovery by reducing stigma and increasing autonomy, but its benefits depend on service delivery models. To realise its potential, implementation must prioritise continuity of care and psychosocial support alongside pharmacological treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.