Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859247›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2026

Identifying risk profile for adolescent e-cigarette use: A sex-stratified machine learning analysis.

Dae-Hee Han, Danyi Li, Raina D Pang, Jimi Huh, Ming Li, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis, Adam M Leventhal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dae-Hee HanDepartment of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Danyi LiDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Raina D PangDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jimi HuhDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ming LiDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jessica L Barrington-TrimisDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Adam M LeventhalDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies show that young females now report higher e-cigarette use than males, reversing prior trends. While sex differences in use are documented, little is known about underlying risk profiles. This study applied a machine learning (ML) approach to identify and compare predictors of adolescent e-cigarette use by sex. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from 1829 9th graders in Southern California (M=14.6 years; 54.7% female) surveyed in 2024. Gradient Boosting Machine, an ML algorithm well-suited for binary classification tasks, was employed to develop past 30-day e-cigarette use prediction models by sex. We additionally fitted a model that combined both females and males to assess overall risk factors. Sixty-eight self-reported variables across conceptual domains were included, and the top 10 predictors per model were identified using scaled importance scores. Results: Overall, 3.6% (n = 66; 3.7% females, 3.5% males) reported past 30-day e-cigarette use. In the female model, depression and post-traumatic stress disorders emerged as leading predictors, but not for males. Top risk factors in the male model included beliefs about and susceptibility to e-cigarette and cannabis use. In the combined model, the strongest predictors were primarily cannabis use and peer e-cigarette use. Model performance was moderate, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.86-0.88 and area under the precision-recall curve values of 0.19-0.54. Conclusions: The findings of this study underscore the importance of considering sex differences when identifying risk profiles associated with e-cigarette use and developing targeted prevention and intervention programs for adolescents.

Indexed as

AdolescentsE-cigarettesMachine LearningRisk ProfileSex Difference

Identifiers

PMID41859247
PMCPMC12996931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.