ArticleJuntendo medical journal2026
Surgical Challenge of Sublobar Resection for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Article in Juntendo medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lobectomy and lymph node dissection have long been the standard surgical procedures for clinical stage IA lung cancer, based on a randomized trial published in 1995. That randomized trial showed better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with lobectomy than with limited resection (segmentectomy or wide wedge resection) for clinical T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, a three-fold higher rate of locoregional recurrence after limited resection was observed. However, recent advances in diagnostic imaging, such as thin-section computed tomography (TSCT), have improved the accuracy of clinical staging and the assessment of ground-glass opacity (GGO) in lung cancer, which is now recognized as being associated with less invasive pathology and a favorable prognosis. Subsequently, to evaluate the efficacy of sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer, three major JCOG trials (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, JCOG0804/WJOG4507L, and JCOG1211) were conducted. These studies stratified patients according to the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) on preoperative TSCT findings. These studies have recently disclosed their results, and they support the efficacy of sublobar resection, although several questions remain in daily clinical practice. In this perspective article, we summarize the current status and optimal surgical strategy for early-stage lung cancer based on these randomized controlled trials and discuss future perspectives, including the potential expansion of segmentectomy to larger or node-positive lung tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.