ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2026
Comparison of a Kidney Intensive Care Unit Healthcare-Led Model versus a Traditional Haemodialysis Nurse-Led Model for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal organisational model for delivering continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) to critically ill patients remains a subject of investigation. Objective: This study compared the impact of a kidney intensive care unit (KICU) healthcare-led model with a traditional haemodialysis nurse-led model on key clinical process indicators and patient outcomes during CRRT. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients requiring CRRT admitted to the KICU of a tertiary hospital between January 2022 and December 2023 were selected. Patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment leadership: the KICU group, where CRRT was led by intensive care unit supervising physicians and nurses certified in critical care blood purification techniques, and the control group, led by supervising physicians and haemodialysis nurses. Data were collected via the hospital information system and nursing records. After propensity score matching, 1180 patients were included in each group. Supplementary multivariable regression analyses were performed to provide adjusted effect estimates. Outcomes included treatment interruption rate, catheter-related infection rate, complication rate, actual delivered effluent dose, catheter insertion to treatment initiation time and patient satisfaction. Results: The KICU group demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (1.8% vs 3.7%, Conclusion: Continuous renal replacement therapy management by a dedicated KICU multidisciplinary team was associated with a lower complication rate, improved delivery of the prescribed dialysis dose, faster treatment initiation and higher patient satisfaction compared with a traditional model. These findings suggest that a structured, healthcare-led model can optimise the CRRT process for critically ill patients. Further multicentre studies are warranted to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.