Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859149›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Academic stressors and coping strategies among MBBS students: a cross-sectional, year-wise comparative study.

Priyanka Rathi, Keshav Banga, Himanshu Singh

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Priyanka RathiDepartment of Pharmacology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, India.
Keshav BangaDepartment of Pharmacology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, India.
Himanshu SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical students experience high levels of stress that vary across different phases of training. Identifying specific stressors and the ways students cope with them is essential for designing meaningful and targeted interventions. Objective: To assess and compare stressors and coping mechanisms among MBBS students across different academic years. Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted among MBBS students and interns at a tertiary medical institute using the Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire (MSSQ) and Brief COPE. Domain-wise stress severity and coping strategies were analyzed. Inferential statistics included Kruskal-Wallis tests with post-hoc comparisons, chi-square analysis for stress severity distribution, and Spearman correlation to examine associations between stress and coping. Results: Academic-related stress was the only stress domain that differed significantly across academic years (H = 48.72, Conclusion: Academic-related stress represents the primary domain showing meaningful variation across stages of medical training, particularly in final-year students. Coping patterns appear relatively stable across academic years, with higher stress associated with increased use of coping behaviors overall. These findings provide a statistically grounded basis for future longitudinal research and targeted strategies addressing academic stress in medical education.

Indexed as

academic stresscoping behaviorcross-sectional studiesmedical educationMSSQ

Identifiers

PMID41859149
PMCPMC12995682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.