Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859145›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Study on the effect of community intervention on patients with hypertension in high-normal blood pressure.

Qingxia Gao, Zhiguang Gao, Qianfeng Yang, Lijun Wang, Lishuang Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingxia GaoChengde Medical University, Chengde, China.
Zhiguang GaoChaoyang Central Hospital, Chaoyang, China.
Qianfeng YangChengde Medical University, Chengde, China.
Lijun WangChaoyang Central Hospital, Chaoyang, China.
Lishuang XuShengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Among patients with hypertension, maintaining blood pressure within the high-normal range is a common clinical scenario, often misinterpreted as adequate control. However, this level remains associated with cardiovascular risk and progression of target organ damage. Yet, evidence is lacking regarding effective community-based interventions in this population. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 12-month, community physician-led standardized health management intervention on blood pressure control rates, lifestyle improvements, and influencing factors in hypertensive patients with high-normal blood pressure, and to explore effective management strategies for this key population. Methods: A series of information surveys and health interventions were conducted among 721 patients (aged 18-80 years) with high-normal blood pressure from communities in Shenyang. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used as primary analytical methods. Results: After 1 year of community intervention, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly decreased in 721 individuals with high-normal blood pressure ( Conclusion: Community-based interventions by primary care physicians targeting individuals with high-normal blood pressure can effectively modify unhealthy lifestyle habits and improve blood pressure control.

Indexed as

community interventionhealth managementhigh-normal blood pressurehypertensionlifestyle

Identifiers

PMID41859145
PMCPMC12995799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.