ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Implementation status and quality improvement strategies of the record-filing system for drug clinical trial institutions in Sichuan Province.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study systematically analyzes the implementation status and existing problems of the record-filing system for drug clinical trial institutions, proposes quality improvement strategies based on empirical data from Sichuan Province, and provides references for the optimization of the national record-filing system. Methods: Based on the National Drug Clinical Trial Institution Record-Filing Management Information Platform and publicly available data, descriptive statistics, trend analysis, and concentration analysis (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, HHI) are adopted. Data cleaning was performed to exclude duplicate records and entries with missing key information (e.g., institution location, specialty registration). Key metrics were clearly defined: ① Institution coverage rate = (Number of registered institutions in the region/Total number of tertiary hospitals in the region) × 100%; ② Regional concentration degree was measured by HHI (calculated as the square of the proportion of institutions in each prefecture-level city to the provincial total); ③ Comparative indices included inter-provincial quantity ranking, intra-provincial regional distribution ratio, and specialty composition percentage. The study sorts out the number, regional distribution, specialty layout, and project undertaking characteristics of clinical trial institutions nationwide and in Sichuan Province, with a focus on analyzing the development differences between institutions in Chengdu and non-central cities. Results: As of September 9, 2025, China had 1,803 registered Good Clinical Practice (GCP) institutions. Sichuan Province ranks the 7th nationwide with 88 registered institutions; however, the distribution within the province is highly uneven (HHI = 0.25, indicating moderate concentration). Chengdu alone accounts for 50.00% of the total (44 institutions), while the coverage rate of institutions in regions such as Western Sichuan and Northeastern Sichuan is less than 30%. Internal medicine dominated the professional distribution (57 institutions, 64.77%), while advanced platforms such as Phase I clinical research units (22 institutions) remained relatively scarce. The number of registered PIs in the province reached 1,424, but only 32.7% were from non-Chengdu institutions. Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital undertook 203 projects following its record-filing, including 26 bioequivalence (BE) trials. Conclusion: The record-filing system has substantially expanded clinical trial resources in Sichuan Province. However, persistent challenges include regional disparities, suboptimal specialization structures, and inadequate quality systems. Newly established institutions should proactively address these common issues through high-standard development, thereby contributing to a more balanced, efficient, and high-quality clinical trial ecosystem in the province.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.