SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid: a systematic review of clinical characteristics and outcomes based on case reports.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multicenter Analysis of Patients with Bullous Pemphigoid: Clinical Characteristics and Insights into Drug-Associated Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Induced Bullous Pemphigoid: A Spanish Multicentric Case Series.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Observational
- Commentary: Pemphigoid associated with quinolone antibiotics: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system and literature-based evidence.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid (ICI-BP) is a rare and complex cutaneous immune-related adverse event (cirAE) that often impacts the continuation of ICI therapy. Currently, there are no prospective clinical studies addressing the optimal management of BP alongside ICI continuation, with existing evidence largely derived from case reports or series. This study systematically analyzes published case reports and series to compile evidence regarding the management of ICI-BP and ICI rechallenge, aiming to inform clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) databases was conducted from their inception to identify eligible case reports and series. Relevant data were extracted using a standardized form. A total of 116 cases from 89 publications were included in the analysis. Results: There was no discernible disparity in the final response rate between patients with mild and severe BP (p > 0.05); however, the percentage of severe patients undergoing escalation therapy was notably higher (p < 0.001). This suggests that employing an active treatment approach based on disease severity effectively ameliorated the potentially graver prognosis in severe cases. Following BP management, 18 patients underwent rechallenge with ICI therapy, with an overall low BP recurrence rate (22.2%), indicating that most patients tolerated the resumption well. Nevertheless, the majority of relapses transpired in patients with initial severe BP, with mucosal invasion, and those who restarted the original therapy, pointing to an elevated risk in this cohort. The 11 deceased patients constituted a high-risk subset distinguished by advanced age (median 74 years), a prevalence of melanoma, and severe BP. The duration from BP diagnosis to demise was briefer in this subset (median 3.7 months), with half of the patients succumbing within 4 months. Conclusion: ICI-BP is usually manageable through a stepwise therapeutic approach, and resuming ICI treatment after lesion remission is generally possible. Clinical decision-making must be tailored to the individual patient. Caution and careful monitoring are essential when reinitiating ICI in patients who initially presented with severe disease or mucosal involvement. For elderly patients, those with melanoma, and individuals experiencing severe BP, heightened vigilance is necessary concerning short-term prognostic risks. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251172315.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.