ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Impaired mucosal IgA response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with inborn errors of immunity.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) often exhibit impaired responses to vaccination and infection, yet their systemic and mucosal antibody dynamics against SARS-CoV-2 remain incompletely understood. Methods: We investigated humoral immunity in 93 IEI patients recruited during the early phase of the pandemic, including pediatric patients with confirmed infection (n=64) and adult patients who received complete inactivated COVID-19 vaccination (n=29). Patients were classified as having primary antibody deficiency (PAD), combined immunodeficiency, or innate immune defects. Results: Receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG levels were comparable between infected children and vaccinated adults; however, PAD patients exhibited the weakest systemic and mucosal humoral responses, with markedly reduced salivary IgA. To validate these findings, we conducted a two-year follow-up of 15 PAD patients compared with 15 healthy controls. Despite regular intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, PAD patients had a ~4-fold higher re-infection rate than controls, with persistently low IgA and IgM in mucosal secretions. IVIg normalized IgG in serum, saliva, and nasal fluids but failed to restore mucosal IgA, which strongly correlated with re-infection frequency. Moreover, IgG responses to the latest emerging variants at the time of study (XBB.1.5, JN.1) declined in both groups, while mucosal IgA was more durable in controls. Conclusion: These findings underscore the critical role of mucosal IgA in protection and highlight persistent vulnerability in PAD patients despite IgG replacement therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.