ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Application Research of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Technology Based on Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Drug-Resistance Detection.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical value of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and detecting resistance to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs, and to compare its performance with traditional methods. Patients and Methods: In this study, BALF samples were collected from 258 patients with suspected PTB and subjected to AFB staining, mycobacterial solid culture, TB-DNA PCR, Xpert MTB/RIF, and tNGS. Using comprehensive clinical diagnosis or phenotypic DST as the reference, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and other metrics of each method and assessed tNGS performance in detecting resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, streptomycin, and ethambutol. Results: Overall, tNGS achieved a sensitivity of 91.10%, specificity of 89.70%, and an AUC of 0.904, all significantly higher than traditional methods. It uniquely identified 24 positive cases missed by other methods. In smear-negative patients, sensitivity remained high at 88.10%, with an AUC of 0.891. For drug-resistance detection, tNGS showed the best performance in judging isoniazid resistance (sensitivity 83.10%, specificity 90.30%), and also showed high negative predictive values for rifampicin, streptomycin, and ethambutol (all > 94%). Conclusion: tNGS provides excellent diagnostic accuracy for PTB and reliable detection of drug-resistant mutations from BALF samples. It is particularly suitable for smear-negative cases and for resistance screening, making it a powerful complement to the existing TB diagnosis system with high clinical application potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.