ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Method-specific beliefs associated with the choice of future contraception among women in refugee settlements in Uganda.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Factors underlying reproductive decisions, including contraceptive method choice, are poorly understood, especially in humanitarian settings where sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs may be highest due to heightened risk of sexual violence and disruptions of health services. The study examined the association between method-specific beliefs and future method choice among women in refugee settlements in Uganda. Methods: Data were from a baseline of a one-year prospective study involving a cohort of 2,498 women aged 15-45 years living in Kiryadongo and Kyangwali refugee settlements. Analysis used cross-tabulation with chi-square test and conditional logistic regression analysis to examine associations between method-specific beliefs and intention to use injectables, implants, or pills among contraceptive non-users. Result: Among contraceptive non-users ( Conclusion: Intention to use contraception in future among non-users in refugee settlements is low, coupled with widespread negative beliefs about available methods. There is need to improve counseling to counter negative beliefs and to expand access to a range of modern contraceptive methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.