ArticlePEC innovation2026
Teaching communication and patient education in nursing: A case study grounded in self-regulated learning and motivation theory.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the preparation, testing, and evaluation of a new undergraduate course on communication and patient education using student feedback, self-regulation theory, and motivational theory. Methods: An exploratory case study design with data collected between 2018 and 2023 in an Icelandic university. Data sources were teachers' meeting memos and notes on the course design and development, nursing students' diaries on the teaching methods, and a survey where students evaluated their own motivation (using the MUSIC® Model of Motivation Inventory), their self-regulation (using the Student Perceptions of Classroom Knowledge-Building survey) and the course's teaching methods and environment. Results: The design of the course was based on Bandura's social cognitive theory, self-regulation theory and motivation theory. Students were found to be motivated, but struggled with self-regulation, particularly regarding the new teaching methods. The faculty learned that new modalities needed to be introduced slowly and interwoven through the whole nursing curriculum to be most impactful. Students needed to be taught how to use the methods and develop a level of comfort before they could be fully effective. While introducing active learning methods was challenging for both teachers and students, adding diverse, evidence-based teaching methods into the curriculum supports the development of complex competencies, like communication and patient education. Conclusions: Teaching methods and content that support students' continuous and active involvement is challenging for both teachers and students. They require thorough preparation and training along with supporting infrastructure from the university. Innovation: Incorporating diverse teaching modalities to foster the development of the interpersonal role of nursing are described. While active, experiential teaching and learning methods are encouraged in nursing education, it is crucial to understand how to support students who are new to these methods, so they can use them effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.