ArticlePEC innovation2026
Understanding essential aspects of fibromyalgia care through a qualitative study of patient feedback.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of Fibromyalgia Across Career Stages: Survey Results From Internal Medicine Physicians and Medical Students.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- Understanding fibromyalgia beyond pain: emotional imbalance and the case for compassionate care.RMD open · 2026Review
- Evaluation of an Invisible Illness Communication Strategy Curriculum Among Internal Medicine Interns.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common, chronic pain syndrome; however, patients with FM report that providers are often ill-equipped to manage this condition. We created an internal medicine-based FM Clinic to address this void and provide evidence-based, patient-centered FM care. This qualitative study aimed to analyze patient experience in the FM Clinic. Methods: Patients were eligible for this study if they met the American College of Rheumatology 2016 diagnostic criteria for FM, attended at least 2 clinic appointments, and completed at least two Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaires (FIQRs). Eligible patients were interviewed regarding overall experience, helpful clinic features, and areas for improvement. Results were qualitatively analyzed to identify themes. Results: Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria and were interviewed. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) prior negative healthcare experiences, (2) appreciation for safe spaces, (3) identification of clinic features that optimized FM care, and (4) areas for improvement. Innovation: Current patient perspectives regarding FM care delivery models are limited and focused on non-pharmacologic group-based interventions. This study is the first to explore patient perspectives on an individualized care delivery model. Conclusions: This study identifies patient-valued elements of FM care that can inform the development of similar care models or FM care provided in other clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.