ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2026
Brain mechanisms underlying self-other distinction for bodily self-recognition.
Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that single neurons in the primate brain specifically encode sensorimotor experience about the self or others. Although the self-other distinction has been a major focus of social neuroscience research, little is known about the underlying mechanisms that enable the recognition of bodily self. Here, we review the literature demonstrating that pre-reflective bodily self-recognition can be achieved through the spatiotemporally contingent integration of visual, somatosensory, and motor signals arising from sensorimotor experience. We propose a self-other inference model as a neural computation for self-other distinction, in which the likelihood of being oneself is updated constantly based on Bayesian causal inference using appearance, contingency, and perspective cues. The results of simulation incorporating a state-space point-process model revealed that our self-other inference model successfully captures the latent state representation about the self-other distinction from synthetic neural activity. We hypothesize that the self-other inference model is implemented by distinct brain areas that process individual cues and their integrative hubs. This hypothesis is experimentally testable using cutting-edge technologies such as area-specific or pathway-selective silencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.