ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Satisfaction and Visual Outcomes with a Non-Diffractive EDOF IOL in Post-Myopic LASIK and PRK Patients with High Corneal Spherical Aberration.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery and Implantation of a Small-Aperture Intraocular Lens in Post-Refractive Surgery Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Trial
- Premium Intraocular Lens Implantation After Laser Vision Correction: An Updated Narrative Review of Biometry, IOL Selection, Visual Outcomes, and Clinical Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate patient satisfaction and visual outcomes with extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in post myopic refractive surgery patients with high corneal spherical aberrations. Methods: This was a non-interventional, observational, ambispective, bilateral, single center multi-surgeon study. Patients had history of myopic LASIK or PRK, and relatively high corneal spherical aberrations, and were bilaterally implanted with Vivity or Vivity toric EDOF IOLs targeting emmetropia. Endpoints included monocular and binocular uncorrected and distance corrected visual acuities at distance (UDVA, CDVA), intermediate (UIVA, DCIVA; 66cm), and near (UNVA, DCNVA; 40cm), binocular defocus curve, and patient satisfaction (IOLSAT) and visual disturbance (QUVID) questionnaires. Results: A total of 20 subjects (40 eyes) completed the study. Mean binocular UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA were 0.02 ± 0.16 logMAR, 0.14 ± 0.13 logMAR, and 0.24 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively. The percentages of eyes with mean residual spherical equivalent and residual astigmatism ≤0.50 D were 95% (38/40) and 98% (39/40), respectively. On the QUVID questionnaire, 0% (0/20), 5% (1/20), and 0% (0/20) of patients reported being "Bothered quite a bit" or "Bothered very much" by halo, starbursts, or glare, respectively. On the IOLSAT, patient reported spectacle use was "Never" or "Rarely" in 90% (18/20), 75% (15/20), and 30% (6/20) of patients at distance, intermediate, and near, respectively. Conclusion: Results suggest good visual outcomes at distance, intermediate and functional near vision and high patient satisfaction with Vivity and Vivity toric IOL implantation in post myopic refractive surgery patients with high corneal spherical aberrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.