ReviewEuropean cardiology2026
Venous Thromboembolism Management and Anticoagulation Opportunities in Cancer Patients.
Review in European cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Comparative Review of Recommendations, Evidence Gaps, and Emerging Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Current Perspectives in Cardio-oncology: Insights from Global Experts.European cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer predisposes to venous thromboembolic complications, especially at the moment of diagnosis, and anticoagulation may be less effective. Additionally, some cancers, especially in the gastrointestinal tract or the genitourinary system, may be associated with an extremely high risk of bleeding. Anticoagulant treatment in venous thromboembolism associated with cancer is characterised by significant differences compared with the general cardiology population. It is necessary to choose the appropriate anticoagulation, either a new non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant or low-molecular-weight heparin. The efficacy and safety are determined by characteristics of the cancer and anticancer therapy. The duration of anticoagulation determines not only the choice of anticoagulant, but also the dose. There is some evidence to justify the reduction of anticoagulant dosage after 6 months of treatment. In active cancer, it is worth continuing anticoagulation indefinitely, but this does not necessarily mean for the rest of a patient's life. It is important to repeat an assessment when the risk of bleeding outweighs the benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.