ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026
Real-World Outcomes of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion as Salvage Therapy for Invasive Fungal Disease.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) has significantly increased in recent years, partly driven by the expanding immunocompromised population, as well as severe influenza and COVID-19. Amphotericin B (AmB) is highly effective against a broad spectrum of fungal infections and has a low drug resistance rate, but its clinical use is limited by toxicity. Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD), a lipid formulation of AmB, is preferred in China for its reduced toxicity. This study assesses real-world clinical outcomes of ABCD as salvage therapy in IFD patients who failed prior treatment with triazoles or echinocandins. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of IFD patients who received ABCD salvage therapy between September 2021 and February 2024. Clinical data were systematically reviewed to assess the clinical outcomes of ABCD. Results: Among the 60 patients included, the clinical response rate to ABCD was 71.7% (43/60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 59.2-81.5%). Outcomes did not vary significantly with factors such as gender, underlying conditions, infection sites, or prior antifungal treatments. Incidence rates of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and infusion-related reactions were 13.3%, 23.3%, and 1.7%, respectively. Five patients discontinued ABCD due to adverse events. Conclusion: In this real-world setting, ABCD salvage therapy was associated with favorable clinical outcomes and an acceptable safety profile in IFD patients who failed prior azole or echinocandin therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.