Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858892›Full record

ReviewiScience2026

Endovascular management for post-dissection aortic aneurysm after prior proximal repair.

Ruihua Li, Jianjun Jiang, Justin B Zhang, Qingnan Ren, Yuanbin Cao, Fengxin Wan, Feng Xu, Xiangjiu Ding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruihua LiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Jianjun JiangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Justin B ZhangNewport High School, Bellevue School District, Bellevue, WA 98006, USA.
Qingnan RenDepartment of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Yuanbin CaoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Fengxin WanDepartment of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Feng XuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Xiangjiu DingDepartment of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic dissection (AD) is a fatal entity, which often involves the thoracic and abdominal aorta extensively. Type A dissections are typically treated with open surgery, while type B dissections are managed conservatively or with endovascular repair. However, post-dissection aortic aneurysms (PDAAs) are common in both types of AD even after the successful sealing of the primary entry tears. PDAAs can cause severe complications including aortic rupture and ischemia of the branch arteries. Various endovascular techniques are used to treat PDAAs after initial repair: endovascular treatment can be performed through the true lumen, the false lumen, the tears, or combinations of said routes. They include the Knickerbocker technique, false lumen embolization, Amplatzer vascular plug, and fenestrated or branched stent grafts. However, no consensus has been reached on the optimal treatment due to a lack of compelling evidence. This review summarizes recent advances in endovascular management of PDAAs after proximal repair.

Indexed as

cardiovascular medicinehealth sciencesmedical specialtymedicinesurgery

Identifiers

PMID41858892
PMCPMC12996712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.