ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Self-experienced empathetic behaviour patterns in medical students during virtual patient encounters: a comparison between an AI-enhanced social robot and a computer-based platform.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore whether an AI-enhanced social robotic virtual patient (VP) platform reinforces empathetic behaviour patterns in medical students compared with a traditional computer-based platform. Methods: Twenty-three sixth-semester medical students from Karolinska Institutet participated in semi-structured interviews following VP encounters with the Social AI-enhanced Robotic Interface (SARI) and, as a comparator, the computer-based Virtual Interactive Case system (VIC). Additionally, 178 students evaluated the VP platforms in empathetic training quantitatively using categorical nominal variables and a visual analogue scale (VAS), with a score of 0 indicating full preference for SARI and 10 full preference for VIC. Interview data were thematically analysed, and quantitative preferences were compared using the Fisher's exact test with Monte Carlo simulation and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Thematic analysis yielded five major themes wherein students consistently reported that SARI facilitated greater empathetic engagement through multimodal interaction, ability to express emotions, and real-time communication adaptability. Quantitative analysis demonstrated a higher preference for SARI versus VIC (78% versus 6%; OR: 190.4; 95% CI: 76.8-472.0; Conclusion: Our AI-enhanced social robotic VP platform was superior to a traditional computer-based VP platform in fostering empathetic engagement in medical students through enhanced authenticity and interactivity, supporting its potential to supplement clinical rotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.