ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Sustainable adoption of artificial intelligence and the Metaverse in higher education: an environmental, social, and governance-based analysis of pedagogical innovation and perceived student learning outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid convergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Metaverse technologies is reshaping the higher education landscape by enabling immersive, personalized, and adaptive learning experiences. However, the long-term sustainability of such innovations remains uncertain without addressing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations. This study develops and empirically validates an ESG-informed framework for Sustainable AI-Metaverse Adoption (SAAM) in higher education. A quantitative research design was employed, collecting data from 280 university students across diverse disciplines through a structured survey. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM-PLS) was applied to assess measurement reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and to test the proposed hypotheses. The empirical results demonstrate that ESG dimensions exert differential effects on sustainable adoption, with environmental and social factors showing stronger direct associations than governance-related variables. Environmental sustainability, through energy-efficient AI systems, significantly enhances SAAM. Similarly, social dimensions, particularly inclusive AI access and student acceptance, exert robust positive effects on sustainable adoption, whereas faculty readiness influences adoption indirectly. Conversely, governance-related factors exhibit comparatively weaker direct effects: institutional policy support enhances digital infrastructure but does not directly influence SAAM, whereas ethical AI use has a limited impact, reflecting student prioritization of usability over ethics in early stages of adoption. Importantly, the outcomes highlight that SAAM substantially fosters digital pedagogical innovation (DPI) and enhanced student learning outcomes (ESLO), confirming its transformative potential. The study contributes theoretically by integrating ESG principles into technology adoption research, offering a multidimensional lens that enriches the understanding of sustainable digital transformation in higher education. Practically, it provides institutions and policymakers with evidence-based insights to design environmentally conscious, socially inclusive, and governance-supported strategies for AI-Metaverse integration. Future research should expand to cross-cultural contexts, larger samples, and longitudinal designs to validate and generalize these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.