Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858813›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Roar Data: Redefining a Lion's Roar Using Machine Learning.

Jonathan Growcott, Alex Lobora, Andrew Markham, Charlotte E Searle, Johan Wahlström, Matthew Wijers, Benno I Simmons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan GrowcottCentre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-1640
Alex LoboraTanzania Wildlife Research Institute Arusha Tanzania.
Andrew MarkhamDepartment of Computer Science University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Charlotte E SearleWildlife Conservation Research Unit, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Johan WahlströmDepartment of Computer Science University of Exeter Exeter UK.
Matthew WijersWildlife Conservation Research Unit, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Benno I SimmonsCentre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For territorial advertisement and intra-pride communication African lions emit a roaring bout, of which one component, is their iconic roar. The full-throated roar of a lion has recently been shown to be a unique and individually identifiable signature. At the same time, the frequency of large-scale passive acoustic monitoring surveys has increased. As such, a lion's roar may soon become a useful tool to count individuals and estimate population density, to supplement traditional survey techniques. Currently, selecting full-throated roars is heavily dependent on expert inference and is therefore subject to human-induced bias. We propose a data-driven approach to automatically classify lions' full-throated roars from the other vocalisations that constitute a roaring bout. By using two-state Gaussian Hidden-Markov Models, we also demonstrate that two types of roars exist within a lion's roaring bout-a full-throated roar and a newly named intermediary roar-and these can be classified at an accuracy of 84.7%. We further demonstrate that using simple metrics to describe lion vocalisations-maximum frequency (Hz) and vocalisation length (s)-and

Identifiers

PMID41858813
PMCPMC12998244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.