ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Age-related changes in static and dynamic postural balance performance.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early ΔNLR Outperforms Baseline Inflammatory Markers in Predicting Short-Term Outcomes in Sepsis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Age-related changes in the neuromuscular and sensory systems compromise the control of balance and stability. Static balance assessments may overlook deficits that appear when coping with unexpected perturbations. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare static and dynamic balance performance in younger and older adults to assess age-related differences in postural control between the two age groups. Methods: Sixty-nine younger adults (24.3 ± 0.4 years) and sixty-one older adults (72.1 ± 0.6 years) performed balance assessments under static and dynamic conditions on a force platform. Center of pressure (CoP) was calculated during quiet standing for static balance and during an unexpected perturbation of the base of support for dynamic balance. In the perturbation-based task, the following CoP-related parameters were analyzed within a 2.5-s window from perturbation onset: displacement (Area95D), Mean VelocityD, anterior-posterior first peak (FP), post-perturbation variability (PPV), and maximal oscillations (ΔCoPMax). Sample Entropy (SampEn X and Y) was computed to infer the automaticity of postural control. Results: In the static test, balance performance did not differ between younger and older adults, although older adults exhibited reduced efficiency ( Conclusion: Age-related changes in balance control are task dependent. Older adults preserved static balance performance but demonstrated impaired reactive balance responses in dynamic tasks. Furthermore, static and dynamic balance rely on distinct control mechanisms, highlighting the need for separate assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.