ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
An Aboriginal community-led approach to reducing alcohol-related harm: A multiple baseline, stepped wedge evaluation.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Three Aboriginal communities in regional Australia led the development and implementation of a community-based program aimed at: i) reducing alcohol-related criminal incidents; and ii) improving community perceptions of community safety and empowerment. Study design: A multiple baseline, stepped-wedge evaluation. Methods: The co-designed program comprised community-specific activities to operationalise three core components that were standardised across all communities: i) improving service engagement; ii) promoting community activities; and iii) increasing community members' empowerment for action. Outcome measures were de-identified crime data (persons of interest and victims from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2017) and pre/post community surveys. Results: Statistically significant improvements in perceptions of alcohol harm were reported in all three communities: i) community 1 significantly increased community empowerment; ii) community 2 reported significantly less alcohol-related verbal abuse and injuries, and feeling significantly safer during the day and at night; and iii) community 3 reported feeling significantly safer at night. There were no statistically significant reductions in alcohol-related crime. Conclusion: This is the first Aboriginal-specific, community-based project in Australia to use a multiple baseline, stepped-wedge evaluation design and an innovative program logic model. Future research could seek to uncover the mechanisms associated with different program impacts on different outcomes and in different communities, and seek to sustain impacts over longer timeframes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.