ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
A local-authority specific definition of research: Results from a Delphi study.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: There is an increasing focus on promoting evidence informed decision making within local government. However, there is a lack of consistency within this setting on how research is defined in the context of evidence for decision making. This lack of consistency presents a challenge for local authority officers in identifying and communicating about research activities and in establishing appropriate research governance and ethics processes.This study aimed to develop a consensus definition of research in a local authority setting. Study design: A Delphi method was used. Methods: Potential definitions of local authority research were identified by the project Steering Committee. These were circulated to the Delphi panel, comprising 60 local authority officers, via an online Round One questionnaire. Round One definitions that achieved high levels of agreement (>75%) from the panel were revised and included in a Round Two questionnaire, circulated to the same panel. Responses from Round Two were taken to an in-person workshop of the project Steering Committee where a consensus definition, reflecting the statements with the highest levels of agreement, was developed. Results: After two rounds of online questionnaire (with response rates of 80% and 77% respectively), four definition statements which had the highest level of agreement were identified by the Steering Committee for inclusion within the final consensus definition. The format and exact content of the definition was finalised by the Steering Committee to reflect key components of the purpose of research and its process, which were identified as being important by the Delphi panel. Conclusions: Our definition of local authority research has potential to support the development of a research culture in local authorities. It provides a basis for communicating about research, identifying opportunities for research and for establishing appropriate ethics and governance processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.