ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2026
Management after two consecutive suction losses during small-incision lenticule extraction: A case report.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suction loss is a small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery complication which may compromise postoperative visual quality. Most instances of intraoperative suction loss can be promptly remedied; however, the reports of two consecutive suction losses leading to an incomplete procedure are limited. In the present case report a 24-year-old man underwent SMILE at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University (Yinchuan, China); the surgery was successfully completed in the right eye, nevertheless, the left eye experienced two consecutive suction losses, resulting in incomplete treatment. At ~1.5 months post operation, the patient presented to The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Xi'an, China) where the treating physicians were unaware of the exact details of the first procedure. At that time, the uncorrected distance visual acuity in the left eye was 20/400, and the corrected distance visual acuity was 20/16. Subsequently, the patient received femtosecond laser-assisted
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.