ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Development and internal-external validation of a risk prediction model for acute pain after HAIC for patients with liver cancer using logistic regression and XGBoost algorithm.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of prediction model for intrapulmonary metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma based on machine learning.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a clinical model for the early prediction of moderate-to-severe pain after Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy (HAIC) in liver cancer patients using XGBoost algorithm and then compare its prediction capacity with the logistic model. Methods: A multicenter cohort study presented according to TRIPOD + AI statement, which was conducted in 3 tertiary hospitals in Shanghai from May 2022 to June 2024. Lasso regression was used to screen for risk factors. Logistic regression and XGBoost algorithm were tested and compared by Brier, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, intercept and slope, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The study included 1303 patients, with 725 for model development, 578 for external validation. In the XGBoost model, the top 3 most important variables were oxaliplatin dosage, initial HAIC treatment and age. XGBoost model and logistic regression model showed discriminative ability with AUC values of 0.729, 0.714, 0.707 and 0.722, 0.715, 0.684 in the modeling, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. The calibration and decision curve analyses of both models showed favorable results in both modeling and validation sets, except for the calibration of logistic regression model in external validation. XGBoost model performed better across all evaluated dimensions in external validation. Based on the risk score generated by the XGBoost model, the population was categorized into low, intermediate, and high-risk subgroups for stratification. Conclusions: XGBoost model has higher accuracy and stronger robustness in predicting acute moderate-to-severe pain after HAIC in patients with liver cancer, which will facilitate risk assessment and implement precise and early interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.