Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858761›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026

Development and internal-external validation of a risk prediction model for acute pain after HAIC for patients with liver cancer using logistic regression and XGBoost algorithm.

Jiacheng Cao, Yina Gong, Fan Wang, Jiayang Zhang, Chunyan Chen, Jiawei Cao, Minghui Xie, Wenjuan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiacheng CaoDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center/ Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yina GongDepartment of Nursing, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fan WangDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center/ Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayang ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center/ Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chunyan ChenDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center/ Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiawei CaoDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center/ Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Minghui XieDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wenjuan ZhaoDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center/ Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a clinical model for the early prediction of moderate-to-severe pain after Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy (HAIC) in liver cancer patients using XGBoost algorithm and then compare its prediction capacity with the logistic model. Methods: A multicenter cohort study presented according to TRIPOD + AI statement, which was conducted in 3 tertiary hospitals in Shanghai from May 2022 to June 2024. Lasso regression was used to screen for risk factors. Logistic regression and XGBoost algorithm were tested and compared by Brier, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, intercept and slope, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The study included 1303 patients, with 725 for model development, 578 for external validation. In the XGBoost model, the top 3 most important variables were oxaliplatin dosage, initial HAIC treatment and age. XGBoost model and logistic regression model showed discriminative ability with AUC values of 0.729, 0.714, 0.707 and 0.722, 0.715, 0.684 in the modeling, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. The calibration and decision curve analyses of both models showed favorable results in both modeling and validation sets, except for the calibration of logistic regression model in external validation. XGBoost model performed better across all evaluated dimensions in external validation. Based on the risk score generated by the XGBoost model, the population was categorized into low, intermediate, and high-risk subgroups for stratification. Conclusions: XGBoost model has higher accuracy and stronger robustness in predicting acute moderate-to-severe pain after HAIC in patients with liver cancer, which will facilitate risk assessment and implement precise and early interventions.

Indexed as

Acute painHAICLogistic regressionPrediction modelRisk classificationXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41858761
PMCPMC12995816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.