ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026
Patient perspectives on post-operative direct oral anticoagulant for venous thromboembolism prevention in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing laparotomy.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is recommended for patients undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic cancers. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction while our program transitioned from low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) apixaban for extended VTE prophylaxis. Methods: Adult patients undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic malignancy in Alberta, Canada between April - December 2024 were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction, measured by the modified Anti-Clot Treatment Scale survey. Secondary outcomes included VTE incidence, major bleeding, and medication adherence. Results: 111 patients were considered for inclusion; 50 patients completed the survey, and 40 patients had both survey and corresponding clinical data. All patients received pre-operative anticoagulation. Upon hospital discharge, 9 patients received LMWH, and 41 received DOAC. No patients experienced a VTE, and 1 patient on DOAC experienced a major bleed. Patients taking DOAC for extended VTE prophylaxis reported significantly less difficulty following anticoagulation treatment, less concern regarding cost of medication, and required less help compared to LMWH. Conclusion: The use of DOAC for extended VTE prophylaxis was associated with high patient satisfaction, further supporting its use in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.