Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858724›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Allometry of Ingestion Among Habitat Mimicking Praying Mantises.

Christopher Oufiero, Marlena Wood, Elizabeth McMillan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher OufieroDepartment of Biological Sciences Towson University Towson Maryland USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-8090
Marlena WoodDepartment of Biological Sciences Towson University Towson Maryland USA.
Elizabeth McMillanDepartment of Biological Sciences Towson University Towson Maryland USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ingestion is the process of consuming a resource and is a component of an organism's handling time, which can limit the acquisition of additional resources and decrease predation rate. If a predator spends more time handling prey, it will have less time to seek out additional prey. Variation in ingestion may therefore impact energy fluxes and ecosystem stability. Body size has been proposed to affect ingestion, with larger organisms predicted to have a reduced handling time, potentially scaling like metabolic rate. The goal of this study was to examine the allometric relationships of ingestion, a proxy for handling time, among praying mantis species with different camouflage strategies in a phylogenetic context. We measured the time it takes adult female mantises to ingest a standard prey using time-lapse photography in 1-8 individuals among 14 species of Mantodea 3-5 times, resulting in 324 trials from 66 individuals. We examined the scaling of ingestion in relation to mantis body size using both a phylogenetic general linear mixed model to account for within-species variation, as well as a phylogenetic generalized least-squares approach on species means. We also compared the scaling of our praying mantis ingestion allometry to other allometric relations of other organisms from a larger database (e.g., other insects, arachnids, and vertebrates). We found that the ingestion rate and time scale with a power-law function regardless of the camouflage strategy. We also found that mantis prey-mass-specific ingestion scaled more like arachnids than insects when compared to the larger database. Comparing our scaling of ingestion to published values of metabolic scaling, we found a higher slope for ingestion. Together, our results suggest that larger praying mantises can ingest more resources than may be needed based on their metabolic rate, which may influence their role in the ecosystem.

Indexed as

consumptionfeedingfunctional responseMantodeapredation

Identifiers

PMID41858724
PMCPMC12998259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.