Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858711›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

The Outcome of 3 Various Reconstructive Procedures After Permanent Filler Removal and Deep Plane Face Lift.

Samir M Ghoraba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Samir M GhorabaFrom the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep plane face lift in patients with previous permanent filler injections is a formidable reconstructive and aesthetic procedure. Various reconstructive techniques have been previously described in the literature to address the defects after removal of permanent fillers. However, no comparative study in the literature has been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness and complications of these reconstructive procedures in the pursuit of achieving aesthetically favorable results with safe techniques. The study aimed to describe the effectiveness and complications of 3 reconstructive techniques: micro-fat grafting, dermal fat grafting, and pedicled flap reconstruction. Methods: A multiarm, randomized, parallel study was conducted among patients who had undergone permanent filler injections between 2014 and 2022. Patients were divided randomly into 3 groups, each comprising 160 individuals; all patients were managed by removal of the permanent fillers, deep plane face lift, and reconstruction of the defects as a consequence of the filler removal. Participants were randomly assigned to 3 groups. This allocation was based on the defect reconstruction method, including dermofat grafting (group A), fat grafting (group B), and a pedicled buccal fat pad flap (group C). The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Results: The most prevalent complications detected were contour irregularity. Fat graft surgery was associated with the highest rates of complications. Conclusions: The pedicled flap technique had the fewest postoperative complications and was superior to fat and dermal fat graft techniques. The results could guide surgeons in optimizing patient selection and surgical techniques to improve patient outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID41858711
PMCPMC12999106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.