ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Unmasking Brugada syndrome: a case report of diagnostic oversights.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an unusual cardiac channelopathy associated with an increased risk of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), highlighting the critical importance of early diagnosis. Case summary: A 22-year-old male patient presented with recurrent episodes of syncope, palpitations, and dyspnoea. Initial electrocardiograms (ECGs) showing a Brugada Type 1 pattern were misinterpreted as incomplete right bundle branch blocks. The patient was erroneously diagnosed with epilepsy due to misinterpretation of his syncope episodes as seizures. After further investigations, including a propafenone provocation test and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), BrS was confirmed. An electrophysiologic study showed no inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF, and a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was implanted for the prevention of SCD. The patient's recovery was successful and uncomplicated. Discussion: Brugada syndrome patients usually present with SCD, syncope, or severe arrhythmias. Syncope is the most common clinical presentation and identifies patients who could benefit from ICD. Only the Type 1 Brugada pattern is diagnostic, either spontaneous, unmasked by high precordial leads, or by sodium channel inhibition. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement is indicated to prevent SCD. A subcutaneous defibrillator should be considered if the patient has no need for anti-bradyarrhythmia pacing. Conclusion: Early recognition of BrS in patients with syncope is critical, especially for first-line providers interpreting ECGs, as it may prevent SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.