Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858699›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026

Case report: primary pericardial tumour-challenges in imaging diagnosis and management.

Nguyen Nhat Dinh Ngo

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nguyen Nhat Dinh NgoDepartment of Cardiology, Hoan My Saigon Hospital, 60-60A Phan Xich Long Street, Ward 1, Phu Nhuan District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0813-6043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary pericardial tumours are exceedingly rare and frequently misdiagnosed due to nonspecific clinical presentations. They may initially manifest through cardiovascular complications such as pericardial effusion, arrhythmias, or embolic events, creating significant diagnostic and management challenges. Case summary: We report a 62-year-old female with a history of dyslipidaemia who was admitted for progressive dyspnoea, mild chest pain, and palpitations. Cardiovascular evaluation revealed new-onset atrial fibrillation, large pericardial effusion, and bilateral pleural effusions. Transthoracic echocardiography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography identified a heterogeneous pericardial mass with invasive features involving the pulmonary artery, complicated by pulmonary artery obstruction. The patient developed cardiac tamponade requiring emergent pericardiocentesis, which drained 550 mL of serous fluid. Cytological analysis of the pericardial fluid suggested a malignant mesenchymal tumour, and subsequent CT-guided biopsy raised strong suspicion for a primary pericardial sarcoma, pending immunohistochemical confirmation. The patient was managed with anticoagulation, rate control for atrial fibrillation, supportive therapy, and multidisciplinary consultation, leading to a planned oncologic treatment strategy. Conclusion: This case highlights the pivotal role of cardiology in recognizing occult malignancy presenting with acute cardiovascular manifestations, the diagnostic complexity of primary pericardial tumours, and the importance of multimodal imaging, histopathology, and multidisciplinary collaboration in emergency and long-term management.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCardiac tamponadeCase reportMultimodal imagingPericardial effusionPrimary pericardial tumourSarcoma

Identifiers

PMID41858699
PMCPMC12998429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.