Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858674›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

Microbiome and plant relationship: a symbiosis against phytopathogens.

Aizada Zholdasbek, Zhanar Tekebayeva, Kamshat Kulzhanova, Akhan Abzhalelov, Zhandarbek Bekshin, Dinara Yevneyeva, Merey Saylau, Xin Li, Zhouliang Tan, Zhaoqi Wang and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of NovelMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aizada ZholdasbekDepartment of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Lev Nikolaevich (LN) Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Zhanar TekebayevaRepublican Collection of Microorganisms, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Kamshat KulzhanovaRepublican Collection of Microorganisms, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Akhan AbzhalelovRepublican Collection of Microorganisms, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Zhandarbek BekshinRepublican Collection of Microorganisms, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Dinara YevneyevaRepublican Collection of Microorganisms, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Merey SaylauRepublican Collection of Microorganisms, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Xin LiChinese Academy of Science, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chengdu, China.
Zhouliang TanChinese Academy of Science, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chengdu, China.
Zhaoqi WangChinese Academy of Science, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chengdu, China.
Aslan TemirkhanovRepublican Collection of Microorganisms, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Zhadyrassyn NurbekovaDepartment of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Lev Nikolaevich (LN) Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytopathogens are among the major biotic stressors limiting global crop productivity. Conventional control methods, including chemical pesticides and fungicides, have contributed to pathogen resistance, environmental pollution, and soil degradation, highlighting the need for sustainable alternatives. This review highlights innovative, eco-friendly strategies that exploit plant-microbe interactions to enhance plant health and resilience across diverse agroecosystems. Rhizosphere-, phyllosphere-, and endosphere-associated microbial assemblages contribute to plant immune enhancement through induced systemic resistance, competitive nutrient exclusion, antimicrobial metabolite production, and mycoparasitism. The review emphasizes the functional roles of beneficial microbial communities and the emerging applications of synthetic consortia and bio-organic fertilizers to improving disease suppression, nutrient use efficiency, and soil fertility. In addition, recent progress in omics-based tools and microbial formulation technologies is discussed as a key driver for translating laboratory findings into practical field applications. However, large-scale implementation remains challenged by high research costs, limited metagenomic infrastructure, and the lack of standardized microbial formulations across environments. Strengthening institutional capacity, integrating omics-based tools, and improving technology transfer will be essential to unlock the full potential of microbiome-based pathogen control. Overall, this review highlights microbiome-based interventions as a sustainable alternative to chemical-intensive plant protection strategies under changing environmental conditions.

Indexed as

antagonismbiological controlendophytesmicrobiomeplant pathogen

Identifiers

PMID41858674
PMCPMC12996167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.