ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Soil conditioners strategies for enhancing selenium bioavailability, and maize biomass in selenium-rich dryland soils.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low selenium bioavailability in selenium-rich soils represents a key constraint limiting selenium biofortification in agriculture. This study evaluated soil conditioning strategies to enhance selenium bioavailability, providing a theoretical foundation for efficient utilization of selenium-enriched soil resources. A pot experiment tested four soil conditioners: organic fertilizer, potassium humate, lime, and biochar, across three consecutive maize plantings. Soil conditioners effectively modified soil physicochemical properties: lime significantly increased pH and available phosphorus, while organic fertilizer increased available sulfur. These amendments markedly affected soluble and exchangeable selenium fractions. All treatments progressively increased the proportion of soluble selenium, with lime and biochar showing the most substantial gains in batches two and three (0.59%, 0.23%, 0.67%, and 0.30%, respectively). Organic fertilizer, lime, and biochar consistently elevated root selenium concentrations across all three batches by 7.79-11.01%, 33.31-135.41%, and 28.84-40.81%, respectively. Potassium humate increased root selenium by 9.04-26.42% in batches two and three. Notably, only lime consistently enhanced shoot selenium by 40.13-87.38% across all batches, while biochar increased shoot selenium by 5.60% in batch three. Plant selenium translocation analysis revealed that only lime treatment in batch three significantly increased the selenium transfer coefficient. Correlation analysis demonstrated a highly significant positive relationship between shoot selenium content and soil pH, whereas root selenium showed no significant correlation with soluble or exchangeable selenium fractions. In selenium-rich dryland soils, conditioner application increases soil pH, thereby enhancing selenium availability and root absorption. Lime proved most effective for increasing crop selenium content, while biochar also substantially improved soil selenium availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.