Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858652›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Ketamine as an NMDA-modulating therapy in bipolar disorder: rationale and evidence.

R Queissner, F Fellendorf, E Z Reininghaus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R QueissnerClinical Division for Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
F FellendorfClinical Division for Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
E Z ReininghausClinical Division for Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bipolar depression remains a leading cause of morbidity, functional impairment, and suicide risk in bipolar disorder. Conventional pharmacotherapies often provide delayed or incomplete relief and may increase the risk of treatment-emergent affective switching. Recent evidence highlights the therapeutic potential of NMDA receptor antagonists, particularly ketamine and its S-enantiomer esketamine, as rapid-acting antidepressants. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes findings from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and real-world studies investigating ketamine and esketamine in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Emphasis was placed on antidepressant efficacy, safety, and the risk of mood destabilization. Results: Across multiple trials, ketamine produced rapid and robust antidepressant effects, with significant improvement in depressive symptoms within hours of administration. Data confirmed high response rates in treatment-resistant bipolar depression, while rapid-onset benefits with minimal switch risk. Further there is evidence on comparable efficacy and safety of intranasal esketamine in bipolar and unipolar depression, with no cases of mania or hypomania. Conclusions: Ketamine and esketamine represent mechanistically novel and clinically effective treatments for bipolar depression. Their rapid antidepressant action and low switch liability distinguish them from traditional antidepressants. Esketamine, with its favorable tolerability and intranasal administration, offers a promising adjunctive option for treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Long-term data are warranted to optimize maintenance strategies and confirm sustained safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

bipolar depressionesketamineketamineNMDA receptortreatment-resistant depression (TRD)

Identifiers

PMID41858652
PMCPMC12996925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.