Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858635›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026

Qualitative Study of Learned Helplessness in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Colostomy: A Social-Ecological Perspective.

Xianqi Wei, Lujuan Wu, Xuan Chen, Jinxia Ding, Qingling Hua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xianqi WeiSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Lujuan WuSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Xuan ChenSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Jinxia DingSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Qingling HuaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the experience of learned helplessness among colorectal cancer ostomy patients within the theoretical framework of social ecosystems, and to provide a theoretical basis for developing targeted nursing interventions for this population. Methods: Employing purposive sampling, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 16 colorectal cancer patients with ostomies at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between March and June 2024. Data analysis was performed using Colaizzi's phenomenological methodology. Results: A total of three main themes and nine sub-themes were identified, as follows: (1) Micro-level systems: fear and negative cognition, self-care barriers and dependency, and self-regulation fatigue and loss of control; (2) Meso-level systems: heavy economic burden, the importance of family support, and social avoidance and stigma; (3) Macro-level systems: insufficient medical information and services, social cognitive bias, and the importance of social security policies. Conclusion: Learned helplessness in colorectal-cancer patients is driven by synergistic systemic factors. Healthcare providers should implement multifaceted, individualized interventions that target psychological distress and mitigate helplessness across the entire care trajectory.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerlearned helplessnessqualitative researchsocial-ecological theorystoma

Identifiers

PMID41858635
PMCPMC12998670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.