ReviewiScience2026
Precise perioperative assessment and anesthesia strategy for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in high-risk cardiovascular disease patients.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at substantially increased risk during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy (PGE). Cardiopulmonary comorbidities, bowel preparation-related hypovolemia, and procedural stressors contribute to hemodynamic and respiratory instability. The conventional American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification incompletely captures these dynamic risk factors and may fail to identify up to 42% of high-risk patients, contributing to a markedly increased incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events. We propose a bundled, physiology-driven perioperative strategy to improve safety in high-risk CVD patients undergoing PGE. This approach incorporates four key components. First, dynamic risk stratification using nomogram-based models (c-statistic up to 0.79) integrates cardiopulmonary and end-organ reserve (CPER), procedural variables, and biomarker trajectories, outperforming static ASA classification. Second, cardiovascular risk-adapted pharmacologic strategies prioritize hemodynamically stable regimens, favoring dexmedetomidine-ketamine over propofol-opioid combinations in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and applying albumin-adjusted dosing in hepatic dysfunction (e.g., remimazolam ED
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.