ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Novel Dual Strategy Based on EPR/AT for Optimizing Therapeutic Effect by Improving Drug Delivery System Physicochemical Properties and Regulating TME.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Astragaloside IV and rapamycin co-loaded bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome nanocarriers for targeted modulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Engineering smart polymeric lipid nanoparticles for breast cancer: AI-guided formulation design, biological barriers, and translational constraints.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical advancement of cancer nanomedicine is significantly hindered by its limited accumulation in tumors, a key factor behind the frequent failure of nanodrugs in clinical trials. The effectiveness of these nanodrugs is closely tied to their route of administration, whether oral, transdermal, intravenous, or intracerebral, as each path presents unique physiological barriers that impede bioavailability and precise tumor targeting. Among the major causes of poor accumulation are rapid clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system, opsonization accompanied by protein corona formation, renal filtration, and the abnormal, heterogeneous nature of tumor vasculature that restricts passive targeting via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. In response, active targeting (AT) strategies have been widely explored, including surface modification with ligands, antibodies, or aptamers designed to bind specifically to overexpressed receptors on cancer cells or blood vessels. Despite these efforts, challenges such as the dense extracellular matrix, elevated interstitial fluid pressure, and the notable inconsistency of the EPR effect between animal models and human patients continue to limit therapeutic penetration. This review offers a systematic examination of nanodrug delivery pathways and the reasons behind their inadequate accumulation, highlighting the potential of both active targeting and combined passive-active strategies to enhance tumor-specific delivery. Overcoming these biological barriers through refined nano-design is crucial for developing the next generation of nanomedicines with improved tumor accumulation and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.