Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858539›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Comparative clinical and epidemiological characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of uterine torsion in camels, buffaloes, and cattle: a multicenter study.

Ahmed Ali, Derar R Derar, Mohamed Rawy, Yousef M Alharbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed AliDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Derar R DerarDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed RawyDepartment of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.
Yousef M AlharbiDepartment of Medical Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uterine torsion is a leading cause of dystocia in large domestic animals. However, there is no systematic comparison of its clinical presentation, epidemiological data, risk factors, or outcomes in camelids, buffalo, and cattle. Methods: Between 2008 and 2023, data were collected from closed and open housing systems in multiple regions (Qassim region, Saudi Arabia and Minia Governorate, Egypt). A total of 3,557 camels ( Results: Closed housing led to significantly higher rates of uterine torsion in all species ( Conclusion: This study reveals significant species-specific differences in the clinical presentation and epidemiology of uterine torsion. The identified patterns in timing, direction, location, and severity provide critical evidence for developing tailored diagnostic and management strategies in camels, buffaloes, and cattle.

Indexed as

buffalocamelcattleclinical featuresprevalencerisk factorsspecies comparisonuterine torsion

Identifiers

PMID41858539
PMCPMC12997415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.