Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858517›Full record

ArticleIDCases2026

Sangitha Jayagandan, Mary Stephen, Sudarsan Bagavane, Rakhi Biswas, Amit Kumar Deb

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in IDCases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sangitha JayagandanDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Mary StephenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Sudarsan BagavaneDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Rakhi BiswasDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Amit Kumar DebDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Open globe injuries [OGIs] are ocular emergencies which can lead to visual impairment, especially when associated with infection. Methods: This case report presents a rare case of Results: The patient underwent evisceration as the globe tissue was friable and could not be salvaged and promptly started on antibiotics. Anaerobic culture of a foreign body removed during surgery showed growth of Conclusion:

Indexed as

Anaerobic ocular infectionClostridium perfringensEndophthalmitisEviscerationFirecracker injuryIntraocular foreign bodyOpen globe injury

Identifiers

PMID41858517
PMCPMC12997001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.