Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858513›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Impediments to transforming the healthcare delivery system: shifting the paradigm from provider centric to patient centric.

Elizabeth A Regan, Manasa Devi Chinta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth A ReganHealth Informatics Lab, Integrated Information Technology Department, Molinaroli College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Manasa Devi ChintaHealth Informatics, Integrated Information Technology Department, Molinaroli College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Stated aims for digital healthcare transformation frequently cite goals for better coordinated patient-centric systems. However, despite advances in medical science, digital technologies, health policies, and billions of dollars invested over the past 25 years, most healthcare providers are far from fully realizing the demonstrated benefits of today's digital technologies for improving patient care. Sharing information across healthcare systems remains challenging. Problems with fragmentation, quality, inequities, and rising costs of care delivery persist. A recent study of 1,026 U.S. hospital systems found that only 15.8 percent achieved a digital maturity level needed to provide digitally enabled healthcare services to better coordinate patient care. More importantly, hospital systems that were most successful in digitally transforming demonstrated significantly superior patient outcomes. From a system engineering framework, we pose the problem as: How do we transform a system as complex as U.S. healthcare delivery from today's costly, fragmented provider-centric system to a better coordinated patient-centric system with improved quality, access, affordability, and patient and provider experience. Methods: This mixed methods, cross disciplinary research employs an integrative approach, synthesizing diverse sources of evidence to explore challenges and issues associated with healthcare digital transformation. Data extraction was performed by studying the full text of over 100 articles, case studies, and other sources, which were then analyzed thematically employing a "framework synthesis" methodology, which uses a deductive approach rather than the more common inductive synthesis approaches. Results: Research points to multiple factors impeding progress, not the least of which is the sheer complexity of the problem. Healthcare systems that achieved significantly superior results reported different approaches to digital transformation in ways that may not necessarily be apparent on the surface, primarily because it is not just about what they did but, more importantly, about how they did it. A growing body of knowledge indicates that achieving digital transformation requires substantially different systemic approaches to the problem that intersect across clinical, technical, behavioral, and organizational domains. In other words, systemic problems cannot be solved with siloed solutions. Discussion: This research explores these differences with the aim of determining how approaches differ, why the differences matter, and implications for achieving better results. Conceptualizing the healthcare delivery system as distinct from the practice of healthcare (medical practice) makes an important contribution to the evolving science of healthcare delivery - working

Indexed as

design sciencedigital transformationhealthcare delivery scienceimplementation sciencepatient centricproblem-driven researchsocio-technical systemssystems engineering

Identifiers

PMID41858513
PMCPMC12996239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.