ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Functional shape of the proximal radioulnar joint: anatomical characterization through Alpha and Beta Angles.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) plays a critical role in forearm rotation through the articulation between the radial head (RH) and the ulnar notch. While previous studies have emphasized the importance of congruency for joint stability, limited data exist on anatomical variations in healthy individuals and their potential biomechanical implications. This study aimed to describe novel anatomical parameters of the PRUJ. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 104 elbow computed tomography scans from patients without elbow instability or deformities was performed. Measurements were taken on standardized axial computed tomography slices using two novel angular metrics: the Alpha and Beta Angle. Linear regression was used to assess the association between these angles. Results: The mean Alpha Angle was 139.82° (standard deviation 10.08°), while the mean Beta Angle was 81.25° (standard deviation 11.04°), both showing high interindividual variability. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between Alpha and Beta Angles (β = -0.53, 95% confidence interval: -0.72 to -0.34, Discussion: A larger Alpha Angle implies a less concave notch and reduced bony constraint of the RH, increasing the reliance on ligamentous structures, particularly the annular ligament, for joint stability. Conversely, a higher Beta Angle, indicating increased RH coverage, may confer greater intrinsic stability. Conclusion: The study identifies a significant inverse relationship between the Alpha and Beta Angles of the PRUJ, supporting the concept that ulnar notch morphology affects RH coverage and forearm stability. These reference values in healthy elbows may serve as a baseline for future comparisons in pathological conditions and inform the diagnosis and management of joint instability and degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.