ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Tonal modulation influences on musical sight-reading.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musical sight-reading requires decoding visual notation into coordinated motor actions, making it an invaluable paradigm for studying the perceptual and motor representations underlying perception-action coupling. Two experiments examined the impact of tonal modulations on sight-reading, having pianists perform melodies varying in the tonal distance of their modulation (no modulation, close modulation, mid modulation, and far modulation). Experiment 1 presented melodies in a random order, whereas Experiment 2 presenting melodies blocked by condition (no modulation melodies first versus modulating melodies first). In both studies, analyses of performance errors revealed increased errors from the initial key to the subsequent key. Additionally, both experiments found gradated tonal distance effects, with far modulations producing the largest difference in error rate between initial and subsequent keys, no modulations producing the least difference, and close and mid modulations falling in between the two. Finally, both experiments observed a spike in error rates, with errors peaking at the transition point from the initial to the subsequent key. Of note is that Experiment 1 showed this (albeit non-significant) pattern for the no modulation melodies, suggesting that pianists developed expectations for key modulation irrespective of its occurrence. Experiment 2 confirmed this hypothesis, demonstrating no change in error rates for no modulation melodies when pianists performed these melodies prior to experiencing the modulating melodies. Together, these results support a perception-action account of piano performance, and suggest intriguing new directions for research on real-time music performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.