ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
On the origin of our fascination with crystals.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crystals are fascinating structures of solid or liquid matter where atoms, molecules, and/or ions are, on average, arranged in a highly ordered lattice. It is well-documented that some of the earliest objects collected by our hominin ancestors, without evident practical purpose, were small quartz and calcite crystals. These crystals, measuring a few centimeters, had no known utility as weapons, tools, or ornaments. However, hominins appear to have appreciated these stones, collecting and transporting them from their place of discovery to their shelters. This behavior, registered as far back as 780,000 years ago, has been interpreted as early evidence of symbolic thought in much younger archaeological contexts. In this study, we adopted an experimental approach to investigate the factors underlying the nature of our ancestral fascination with crystals. We designed a series of experiments with enculturated chimpanzees, one of our two closest living nonhuman relatives, who share significant genetic and behavioral traits with humans. The experiments aimed to identify which physical properties of crystals might have attracted chimpanzees and hominins. Our results suggest that enculturated chimpanzees can identify and distinguish crystals from other types of stones. We found that transparency and geometric shape were the two attractors guiding chimpanzees. These properties are notably salient in the natural environments of both chimpanzees and hominins. Furthermore, the crystals elicited exploratory behaviors in the enculturated chimpanzees, who engaged in voluntary and intentional actions to investigate crystalline transparency and compare shape. We discuss the relevance of these findings for understanding hominin behavior, proposing that similar responses to crystals in hominins and non-hominin apes could reflect a shared cognitive predisposition. Our study provides insights into the potential role of crystal collection in cognitive evolution and highlights the significance of material properties in shaping early symbolic behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.